Relevant market resources
readily available to you

The savvy investor knows to take advantage of timely information, so we’re happy to provide regularly updated market commentary and a weekly snapshot of the market, along with timely financial articles, and links of interest. It’s a good reason to return to our website, week after week. As always, if there is anything else you ever need, feel free to let us know.



Economic Monitor – Weekly Commentary
by Eugenio Alemán

September data seems to show economy rebounding

October 4, 2024

The recent fears regarding the state of the U.S. employment sector seemed to have disappeared completely this morning as markets are ‘recalibrating’ their view on the U.S. economy going forward. Not only are markets now agreeing with the Federal Reserve (Fed) on the number of rate cuts expected before the end of this year but the yield on the 10-year Treasury increased once again, signaling markets are starting to believe that the economy is not weakening as they had thought.

However, we want to remind readers that markets typically overreact to new data and that there is the potential for this data to be revised in the future, so moderation seems to be in order when analyzing one data point. This is especially true today, considering that the Boeing strike would start to show up in the employment report for October, which is expected to be released on the first day of November.

The ISM Services PMI also showed some acceleration in the U.S. service economy, which is the largest sector of the economy, in September. However, that Index showed services sector employment contracting in September, which seems to be inconsistent with the nonfarm payrolls reported today. This should also be a sign that while today’s employment number was very strong, there is the potential for that number to be revised lower in the coming months and even later next year when the benchmark revisions are made. We need to remember that the benchmark revisions for the period April of 2023 to March of 2024 showed that employment growth was revised down by 68,000 per month, with markets also overreacting to that information several months ago.

Federal Reserve be aware: Risks are plentiful

The recent economic environment looks promising for the Fed with markets now repricing their outsized expectations for the path of the federal funds rate during the rest of this year. Although we understand why markets are expecting a more forceful move by the Fed, the central bank knows that it has to move with caution, especially if the economy continues to show no signs of slowing down.

Lower interest rates imply higher lending, especially in the home mortgage space and this could potentially create further inflationary pressures down the road due to the potential effects on home prices. At the same time, as we have said in the past, the Fed needs to be conscious of the still strong fiscal tailwinds produced by the three acts passed during the Biden administration, the CHIPS Act, the IRA, and the Infrastructure Act, which has kept nonresidential investment in expansion during this period of very high interest rates.

And if these concerns are not enough, inflation could also be impacted by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, especially if the Israel/Iran conflict continues and starts to affect the price of petroleum. Thus, geopolitical risks are an important consideration for the Fed. Furthermore, domestically, we have the Boeing strike with more than 32,000 Boeing workers walking off the job, which is expected to have significant impacts on production, especially if the strikes persist.

Boeing shares are down over 40% this year and rating agencies have placed the company under review for a potential credit downgrade. Current negotiations are ongoing, but the workers’ union rejected the latest offer, and so far, it seems an agreement is unlikely to be reached soon enough to avoid a larger impact on economic activity. The last Boeing strike occurred in 2008 and lasted for nearly two months, ultimately impacting ~33,000 production workers’ income by $7,000 according to an article from the New York Times.

From an economic perspective, the strike may have already started to show in this week’s Durable Goods Orders preliminary release, and we will likely see new orders of transportation equipment as well as shipments of transportation equipment reflecting the strike until the strike is over. The impact could be felt in October’s employment report as machinists were still being counted on Boeing’s payrolls in September.

However, if Boeing’s strike persists for several weeks, it may have broader repercussions for local businesses as well as Boeing’s suppliers. For example, Spirit AeroSystems has announced that if the strike continues it may have to furlough workers as 70% of its revenues come from the production of Boeing’s 737 MAX’s fuselage, which will have to be paused.

A decline of ~30,000 Boeing workers, plus ~12,000 Spirit employees, would reduce the number of nonfarm payrolls, but the largest impact will most likely be reflected in an increase in the unemployment rate. This is because if ~42,000 individuals were suddenly counted as unemployed, the Household Survey, which is the survey which the rate of unemployment is calculated from, would need to add nearly 900,000 jobs during the same month to keep the rate of unemployment unchanged. Although this is not impossible, having that number of jobs added during a typical month in the Household Survey is highly unlikely.

While we wouldn’t consider an increase in the rate of unemployment due to the strike a sign of worsening economic conditions, markets might think otherwise and could potentially push for the Fed, once again, to lower rates more aggressively. We believe the issues at Boeing are temporary, and that the Fed is unlikely to change its mind over this matter and will stick with the SEP projections of 50bps of cuts between now and the end of the year.

This is the reason why Fed officials always argue that whatever they are going to do remains “data dependent.”


Economic and market conditions are subject to change.

Opinions are those of Investment Strategy and not necessarily those Raymond James and are subject to change without notice the information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. There is no assurance any of the trends mentioned will continue or forecasts will occur last performance may not be indicative of future results.

Consumer Price Index is a measure of inflation compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Studies. Currencies investing are generally considered speculative because of the significant potential for investment loss. Their markets are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising.

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Small Business Optimism Index is a composite of ten seasonally adjusted components. It provides a indication of the health of small businesses in the U.S., which account of roughly 50% of the nation's private workforce.

The producer price index is a price index that measures the average changes in prices received by domestic producers for their output. Its importance is being undermined by the steady decline in manufactured goods as a share of spending.

Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members.

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1050 | Washington, D.C. 20006
T: 202.872.5900 | TF: 800.982.3035 | F: 866.522.9587
Map & Directions