Economic Monitor – Weekly Commentary
by Eugenio Alemán
Fed Chairman not in a rush
November 15, 2024
The Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman seems to be happy with the market’s new wisdom regarding the path of interest rates going forward. At a presentation on November 14, he said that the Fed is not in any hurry to reduce rates and is probably pointing to an important repricing (see below) of federal funds cuts coming into play when the Fed publishes the new Summary of Economic Projections and its dot plot after the December Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting.
Today, the markets have moved to –at most – two rate cuts compared to expecting between four to five rate cuts before the election. The Fed chairman seems to be indicating that since the economy is growing strongly, it may hold off in cutting rates as aggressively next year as expected when the Fed released its September SEP.
Furthermore, the potential for higher inflation depending on if and how the new administration’s policies are implemented next year could also have started to take shape within the Fed and his new comments are probably a reflection of the effect politics is having on monetary policy.
The Fed doesn’t need a new monetary cycle to begin anew, and they seem to be happy with where rates, but especially mortgage rates, are today. These high rates are going to prevent a resumption in mortgage lending and will probably keep real money supply growth contained until they feel more comfortable with the future path of inflation. At the same time, this repricing will allow the Fed to lower interest rates in December and then continue to say that their future moves will remain ‘data dependent.’
Markets are repricing rate cuts: Pick your explanation
One week after the results of the U.S. presidential and congressional election and with a Republican sweep, markets have continued to reprice their expectations regarding the Fed‘s path to lower interest rates. Explanations for the repricing of interest rates include the imposition of tariffs and the deportation of a large number of illegal immigrants by the incoming Trump administration; higher economic growth; the impact of several of Trump’s campaign promises regarding the non- payment of taxes on tips, on social security payments, on overtime pay, etc.; the effects on the US deficit and debt of a potential extension of the 2017 Trump tax cuts; etc.
Then there is one explanation that has been there since before the election that has the potential to keep interest higher than expected. This explanation has to do with the argument that there have been structural changes in the U.S. economy and that it will be impossible for the Fed to lower inflation to 2.0%.
On this last explanation we have written a lot over the last several years, so we are not going to go into it too much here. The only thing we are going to say is that the Fed has a target of 2.0% and they are going to bring down inflation to the 2.0% target. If there have been structural changes that will make it more difficult for the Fed to achieve the 2.0% inflation target, then that means that interest rates may also have to be higher than originally estimated by markets.
But let’s look at each of the other new explanations one by one and see if they hold true.
Tariffs and deportation: Yes, tariffs and deportation of illegal immigrants, if conducted according to campaign promises, have the potential to increase inflation. The effects of tariffs on prices will probably be immediate while the effects of deportations on labor costs will take some time to zip through the economy and affect inflation. Thus, these two policy proposals have the potential to generate higher inflation and will probably keep the Fed from lowering interest rates, or even increase interest rates if prices increase too much, compared to what markets were expecting before.
Higher economic growth: Yes, higher economic growth –economic growth above what is called potential economic growth – could stretch resource utilization and could trigger higher inflation. And if we add a deportation campaign, it could add to the risks of higher inflation. An increase in the productivity of labor, as we have had over the past year or so, if sustained, could reduce the impact of stronger growth on inflation, but in general, we could see higher prices in this environment, which could keep the Fed from lowering interest rates as much as what markets had expected.
Lower taxes: No taxes on social security, tips, and/or on overtime pay, plus the extension of the 2017 tax reform could also trigger higher inflation in as much as economic growth remains above potential economic growth, as we argued above. Lower taxes will increase take-home pay and will give individuals who benefit from those lower taxes more money to spend, raising consumer demand. This could also put pressure on prices and keep the Fed from lowering interest rates as markets were expecting before the election.
Fiscal deficit: The increase in the deficit and the debt will probably have very little impact on the Fed’s decision to continue to cut interest rates and on inflation. We always hear that this is the biggest risk for the markets, and it definitely is, but if you look at what has happened with interest rates in developed countries that have had large deficits for decades and even a larger debt as a percentage of GDP than the US, it is clear that those issues are not going to keep the Fed from lowering interest rates. It is true that Treasury yields may be higher going forward than what they were before the pandemic, but it is all the other reasons, rather than the increase in the deficit and the debt, that will determine where the yields on Treasurys settle.
Economic and market conditions are subject to change.
Opinions are those of Investment Strategy and not necessarily those Raymond James and are subject to change without notice the information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. There is no assurance any of the trends mentioned will continue or forecasts will occur last performance may not be indicative of future results.
Consumer Price Index is a measure of inflation compiled by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Studies. Currencies investing are generally considered speculative because of the significant potential for investment loss. Their markets are likely to be volatile and there may be sharp price fluctuations even during periods when prices overall are rising.
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Small Business Optimism Index is a composite of ten seasonally adjusted components. It provides a indication of the health of small businesses in the U.S., which account of roughly 50% of the nation's private workforce.
The producer price index is a price index that measures the average changes in prices received by domestic producers for their output. Its importance is being undermined by the steady decline in manufactured goods as a share of spending.
Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members.
